![]() The Dunkirk Update also brings a new foliage system to Day of Infamy, which the developers claim improves the graphical fidelity of the Source engine. ![]() This battle only took place days after D-Day, and saw the British 6th Airborne Division take back the small town of Bréville-les-Monts from the Germans, with matches on this map replicating that battle. In addition to the Battle of Dunkirk, this free update also adds a new map based on Battle of Breville. Day of Infamy's adaption of this battle has the Wehrmacht players attempt to push back the Commonwealth forces and successful capture Dunkirk. Many Allied troops were cut off and surrounded on the beaches of Dunkirk, France, but with the help civilian boats over 338,000 soldiers were successfully evacuated. This weekend, Christopher Nolan's new movie Dunkirk hit theaters, garnering critical acclaim, so the developers decided to release a new Dunkirk themed update for the game.įor those who may not know, the Battle of Dunkirk was one of the most important turning points of World War II. Then, in May, a big free updating adding Australian units and a map set in the Rhineland. :D), im sure even people with laptops with APU-s can enjoy it.New World Interactive finally released Day of Infamy, its World War II themed multiplayer FPS, on March 23 after a brief period in Early Access. On the other hand it runs very well(Arma 2 or Arma 3 Iron Front doesnt. Unity is loved by indies, runs great, but you cant go for markedly better graphics than Source can provide, its not aimed at eye candy.ĭay of Infamy currently looks okay, not a Battlfront or Battlefield 1 experience, but decent, somehow Iron Front on Arma 3 engine comes to mind with smaller maps. However both games suffer from insane performance problems, even turning everyting to "butt ugly" they run badly on low-mid end machines, which limits their user base.ĬryEngine is the same, you can create amazing graphics, but has worse dev tools than UE, and the programmers will struggle to make the fancy new game run on anything below Core i5 and Geforce 970. UE4 games like Squad and ARK Survival Evolved look fantastic when everything is turned up. Though that doesnt mean those are more suitable for their needs. Originally posted by Double Double:you have A LOT more competition out now, with better Engines such as UT4 (which is cheap to licence) Then you should enjoy Sandstorm, which is being made on the Unreal 4 engine. Originally posted by Argyll:Do you drink Tim Horton's coffee even though there are so many better options? That being said I still think Source games are ugly even CSGOĭoesn't mean it's a bad game or that I won't pick it up. You have A LOT more competition out now, with better Engines such as UT4 (which is cheap to licence) There are no better options than Tim HortonsĪnd insurgency sold well because it's been out over 2 years, and you had some crazy discounts on steam. ![]() It will probably be more like 'I need to change my undies.' ![]() When playing the game, being shot at, the last thing you are thinking about is the resolution of a texture. It's easy to call out the obviously dated graphics from static screenshots or gameplay videos, when you aren't actually immersed in the gameplay. We faced the same challenge when releasing Insurgency and still managed to sell well over 2 million copies. Originally posted by Double Double:I am just saying that with such a dated engine it might turn off a lot of people Do you drink Tim Horton's coffee even though there are so many better options? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |